Canon and Sony News, Deals, What's New

One Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens is in stock at Amazon via Canon-authorized K&M.

Learn more: Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens

The Canon RF 10-20mm F4 L IS STM Lens is in stock at Adorama.

Learn more: Canon RF 10-20mm F4 L IS STM Lens Review

The a9 series targets sports and action, and the a9 III is Sony's latest model in that series. This camera was introduced earlier in the same year as the R1, and includes some outstanding features.

Check out the R1 vs. a9 III specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras.

What are the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the a9 III? Here are the R1 advantages:

• ISO 100-102400 expandable to 50 and 409600 vs. 250–25600 and 125 to 51200 (notably, the a9 III omits the lowest noise settings)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• AF working range of EV -7.5 to 21 vs. EV -5 – 20 (the Canon camera focuses in darker environments)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 1200-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• 230 image RAW buffer vs. 106
• Has 6K RAW
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• Has a top LCD panel
• Dual CFexpress Type B slots vs. dual multi slot for SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-I/II)/CFexpress Type A (Type B cards are faster and less expensive than A cards, but A cards are smaller and SD cards are less expensive)
• Higher capacity battery rated for 1330 LCD and 700 EVF vs. 530 and 400 (the a9 III's battery grip doubles these numbers, closing much of the gap)
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera (both with JPG output only)
• 8.5-stop IBIS vs. 8

The a9 III's advantages are:

• Global shutter, 0 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 2.7 ms (While this difference seems small, the global shutter can eliminate some issues, such as LED signage flicker)
• 120 fps continuous shooting vs. 40 (while 40 fps is sufficient for most needs, the 120 fps difference is noticeable)
• Metering range of EV -5 – 17 compared to EV -3 – 20
• +/- 5.0 EV exposure compensation vs. +/- 3
• 1/80000 shutter vs. 1/64000 (likely few us us will care about this difference)
• Flash sync to 1/80000 vs. 1/400
• 0.64" (16mm) EVF vs. 0.50" (12.7mm)
• 240 fps EVF refresh rate vs. 120 fps
• 4-axis multi-angle touchscreen LCD vs. vari-angle
• Considerably smaller and lighter: 26.0 vs. 39.3 oz (737 vs. 1115 g) (but the a9 III's grip adds 10.23 oz (290 g) and considerable size, closing the gap)
• Slightly less expensive

Again, comparing across brands is significantly challenged by the differing interface and ergonomics, and these two cameras are vastly different. Those advantages are a personal preference.

If you have not already done so, order the R1 immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R1

Sony Alpha 9 III

Three Sigma DG DN Art lenses have firmware new updates available:

• Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art Lens version 04
• Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art Lens version 02
• Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art Lens version 04

Download these updates from Sigma Global.

These firmware updates incorporates the following fixes and enhancements:

1. Compatibility with continuous shooting of up to approximately 120 frames per second has been added for the autofocus modes (AF-S/DMF/MF) on Sony a9 III cameras.
2. The operational stability has been improved. (only Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art Lens)

Let's compare a pair of outstanding Sony cameras, starting with the flagship Sony Alpha 1. Check out the R1 vs. Alpha 1 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras.

What are the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the a1? Here are the R1 advantages:

• 40 fps for 230 RAW images vs. 30 fps for 238 (96 frame using the comparable lossless compression) (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast)
• 12 fps with mechanical shutter vs. 10 (only matters if you use it)
• More framerate options – 40, 30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 compared to 30, 20, 15, and 5 (with electronic shutter, but the mechanical shutter adds 10, 8, 6, and 3)
• 2.7 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 3.8 (while technically a win for the R1, you won't likely notice the difference, and the Sony is reading 50 megapixels at that speed)
• AF working range of EV -7.5 to 21 vs. EV -4 – 20 (the Canon camera focuses in considerably darker environments)
• ISO 100-102400 expandable to 50 and 409600 vs. 100–32000 and 50 to 102400 (the R1 will show less noise at the pixel level, but the two should nearly equalize if the a1 image is down sampled to 24 megapixels — and you won't want to use the highest ISO settings)
• 1/64000 vs. 1/32000 (crazy fast holds a small niche advantage over extremely fast)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 1200-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Electronic shutter flash sync up to 1/400 sec. (some sources say 1/320) vs. 1/200
• 2.1 million dot vari-angle LCD vs. 1.44 million tilt
• Has a top LCD panel
• Dual CFexpress Type B slots vs. dual multi slot for SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-I/II)/CFexpress Type A (Type B cards are faster and less expensive than A cards, but A cards are smaller and SD cards are less expensive)
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera (both with JPG output only)
• 8.5-stop IBIS vs. 5.5
• High-Frequency Anti-Flicker shooting (evaluates the scene and precisely adjusts the shutter speed to avoid banding and flicker, including from LED signage)
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• 4-Channel 24-Bit LPCM Audio vs. 2-Channel 16-Bit
• Higher capacity battery rated for 1330 LCD and 700 EVF vs. 530 and 430 (the a1's battery grip doubles these numbers, closing much of the gap)
• Slightly less expensive

Despite being introduced 3 years earlier, the a1 still holds advantages:

• 50 megapixel vs. 24 (a big difference, but not everyone finds the higher resolution worth the increased storage size and processing time)
• Touch and drag AF area slection vs. not available
• +/- 5 stops exposure compensation vs. 3
• 240 fps EVF vs. 120
• 8K 30p vs. 6K 60p movies
• Pixel Shift Multi Shooting (provides dramatically higher resolution after post processing, but everything in the frame must be still)
• 0.64" (16mm) EVF vs. 0.50" (12.7mm)
• Considerably smaller and lighter: 26.0 vs. 39.3 oz (737 vs. 1115 g) (but the a1's grip adds 10.23 oz (290 g) and considerable size, closing the gap)

Comparing across brands is significantly challenged by the differing interface and ergonomics, and these two cameras are vastly different in those regards. Advantages will often be determined by personal preference.

If you have not already done so, order the R1 immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R1

Sony Alpha 1

Act fast – inventory will not last at these prices.

Browse the refurbished camera and refurbished lens sale at Canon USA.

Expect Canon USA refurbished gear to be like new with an as-new warranty and a great price.

Through Aug 31st, Amazon Prime Card Bonus provides 10% back on the purchase of 43 Canon mirrorless cameras, lenses, and other products.

This percent back is on top of any Canon instant savings available.

Don't have an Amazon Prime Card? Get one here.

The Canon EOS R3 seemed like the mirrorless entrant to the 1 series, but Canon assured us that it was not. However, it was the former performance leader of Canon's MILC lineup.

The R1 now shadows the R3's performance.

Check out the R1 vs. R3 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the R3? Here are the R1's advantages:

• 40 fps for 230 RAW frames vs. 30 fps for 150 (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast, and 150 is a lot)
• Custom high-speed continuous shooting supports higher frame rates
• 2.7 ms imaging sensor readout speed vs. 4.8 (faster is better, but this difference will seldom be noticeable)
• ISO expansion up to 409600 vs. 102400 (you will not want to use these settings)
• Cross-type AF points (holds the potential for higher AF precision)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Smart Controllers with half-press sensitivity for additional control
• 9.44 million dots, 0.90x EVF vs. 5.76 and 0.76x (bigger and better)
• Dual CFexpress type B memory card slots vs. CFexpress type B and SD (though some may prefer having an SD slot available)
• M.Fn3, WB, and second Info buttons
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator processors for exceptionally fast and intelligent AF and AE calculations
• IBIS provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Improved Eye Control AF (potentially a big deal if the R3's Eye Control was not compatible with your eye)
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• Full HD at 240p vs. 120p
• Pre-recording (3 or 5 seconds) (hindsight is far clearer than foresight)
• HDMI Type-A vs. Type-D
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• Longer battery life rating (1330 LCD and 700 EVF vs. 860 and 620)

Here are the R3's advantages:

• 4.15 million dot LCD vs. 2.1 million
• modestly smaller and lighter
• Lower price

If that last bullet did not exist, the easy choice would be the R1. The last bullet is supported, and the R3 provides significant performance for its cost. Still, the most demanding professionals will want the R1.

Use coupon code MFT25 at WEX to save 25% on all Manfrotto products.

"Plus free Manfrotto SD and CFexpress cards with purchases, the chance to win some massive Manfrotto bundles plus free items with a range of different Manfrotto purchases!"

Check out today's B&H Deal Zone for big savings on:

• Syrp Magic Carpet Long Slider (62") – only $166.88 after $300.00 instant savings
• Shape SVT10K 3-Stage Video Tripod with Fluid Head and Bag – only $178.32 after $120.00 instant savings
• PortKeys LH7P 7" High-Bright Touchscreen Monitor with Wireless Control (Black) – only $209.00 after $140.00 instant savings
• Vello FreeWave Fusion Basic 2.4 GHz Wireless Trigger System for Canon – only $27.95 after $12.00 instant savings
• More!

See today's full list of B&H Deal Zone Deals.

The R5 II and R1 now shadow the EOS R3, the former performance leader of the MILC lineup.

Check out the R5 II vs. R3 specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the R3? Here are the R5 II's advantages:

• 45-megapixel imaging sensor vs. 24 (the difference is big, but not everyone wants the higher resolution)
• Pre-continuous shooting (hindsight is far clearer than foresight, and recording an image of an action in the near past is game-changing)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator processors for exceptionally fast and intelligent AF and AE calculations
• IBIS provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Improved Eye Control AF (potentially a big deal if the R3's Eye Control was not compatible with your eye)
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• 8k vs. 6K (higher resolution is better if you use 8k)
• Pre-recording (3 or 5 seconds) (hindsight is far clearer than foresight)
• HDMI Type-A vs. Type-D
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6 GHz vs. 802.11ac (5 GHz)
• Holds 4260 mAh of power in the vertical grip vs. 2750 mAh
• Considerably smaller and lighter (without vertical grip)
• Lower price (though R3 promotions are equalizing this advantage)

Here are the R3's advantages:

• Supports high-speed continuous shooting for 150 RAW images vs. 93
• Custom high-speed continuous shooting supports higher frame rates
• Up to 1/64000 shutter speed vs. 1/32000 (crazy fast vs. extremely fast)
• Smart Controllers (powerful controls after some acclimation)
• 4.15 million dot LCD vs. 2.1 million
• Integrated vertical grip, LAN port, and GPS (outstanding grip ergonomics, the grip, port, and GPS are available accessories for the R5 II)
• Superior dust and weather resistance (with both bodies significantly sealed, will we notice the difference?)
• More controls and buttons (these make the camera faster and easier to use. And, more complicated?)
• More powerful 2750 mAh LP-E19 battery pack vs. 2130 mAh (but the R5 II holds 4260 mAh in the vertical grip)

While most photographers will find the R5 II better suited for their needs, a niche group of photographers will find the R3's advantages important.

If you have not already done so, order the R5 II immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R3

Canon has added second quarter financial results to the Investor Relations page.

Presentation Material
Results
Supplementary Data
Presentation Material and Speech Summary

Quotes From the Presentation Material (in addition to the included chart).

In markets in which we compete, demand remained weak in certain regions due to slowdown in global economic growth

Recovery in camera, network camera, and laser printer sales as inventory adjustments were completed as planned

Steady growth in semiconductor lithography equipment, commercial printing equipment, and medical business sales where medium- to long-term market growth is expected

Achieved 14% increase in sales compared to the same period last year and record high sales for second quarter

Nearly 30% increase in operating profit, profitability raised to 10.1%

Imaging was +11.6% sales and +19.0% operating profit for the quarter and +2.1% sales and -22.9% operating profit for the half.

For B-to-C products (Cameras and inkjet printers), stimulate demand by launching new products and strengthening marketing activities

The 2024 net sales forecast is +10.0% and net income +26.6%

The 2024 net sales forecast for Imaging is +13.0% over the previous forecast, and the operating profit forecast was adjusted +10.8%.

Buy your Canon cameras, lens, and accessories at B&H.

This "Offer ends Jul 28 at 11:59 PM EDT."

Clicking the "Send Email w/ Price" button on many Canon RF lens and EF lens product listings at B&H yields a significant price discount.

If you are interested in a lens on this list, buying it now seems a great idea. Note that the discount link expires in 1 hour and that you may not see the "Send Email w/ Price" button afterwards.

Note that some cameras, including the EOS R3 and RP, also have this button.

Here is the list of RF Lens deals in price descending sequence. The compare at price is the regular new price.

1200mm F8 – $18,999.00 (compare at $19,999.00)
800mm F5.6– $15,999.00 (compare at $16,999.00)
600mm F4 – $11,999.00 (compare at $12,999.00)
400mm F2.8 – $10,999.00 (compare at $11,999.00)
85mm F1.2 DS – $2,599.00 (compare at $3,099.00)
85mm F1.2 – $2,299.00 (compare at $2,799.00)
50mm F1.2 – $1,999.00 (compare at $2,299.00)
135mm F1.8 – $1,799.00.00 (compare at $2,099.00)
85mm F2 – $499.00 (compare at $599.00)
24mm F1.8 – $399.00 (compare at $599.00)
35mm F1.8 – $399.00 (compare at $499.00)
15-30mm F4.5-6.3 – $349.00 (compare at $549.00)
28mm F2.8 – $199.00.00 (compare at $299.00)
16mm F2.8 – $199.00 (compare at $299.00)
10-18mm F4.5-6.3 – $199.00 (compare at $329.00)

Here is the list of EF and EF-S Lens deals.

11-24mm F4 – $1,999.00 (compare at $2,999.00)
100-400mm F4.5-5.6L II – $1,999.00 (compare at $2,399.00)
16-35mm F2.8 III – $1,799.00 (compare at $2,199.00)
11-24mm F4 (gray) – $1,999.00 (compare at $2,999.00)
35mm F1.4 II – $1,599.00 (compare at $1,999.00)
85mm F1.4 – $1,199.00 (compare at $1,599.00)
17-55mm F2.8 – $599.00 (compare at $879.00)
10-22mm F3.5-4.5 – $399.00 (compare at $649.00)
50mm F1.4 – $299.00 (compare at $399.00)

Highlighting some just-arriving gear in the B&H Used Department:

Let's compare the Canon EOS R5 Mark II to the Canon EOS R6 Mark II.

Check out the R5 II vs. R6 II specification comparison along with the visual comparison of these cameras. What are the differences between the Canon EOS R5 Mark II and the R6 II? Here are the R5 II's advantages:

• 45-megapixel backside illuminated (BSI) imaging sensor vs. 24 non-BSI (the difference is big, but not everyone needs the higher resolution)
• 6.3 ms electronic shutter imaging sensor readout speed vs. 14.5 (the faster readout speed is most advantageous for fast movement)
• DIGIC X plus DIGIC Accelerator vs. DIGIC X
• 6144-zone metering vs. 384-zone (more areas evaluated yields potential improvement in auto exposure results)
• Up to 1/32000 shutter speed vs. 1/16000 (extremely fast vs. really fast)
• Individual files are rapidly saved during pre-continuous shooting vs. a consolidated file written after the capture ends (the individual files create a significantly faster workflow in-camera and during post-processing)
• Upgraded AF system, including improved subject detection (especially for photographing subjects in motion)
• Eye Control AF vs. no (dramatically faster AF point or area positioning)
• AF at EV -7.5 vs. -6.5 (darker is better, but EV -6.5 is extremely dark)
• 5.76 million Dot EVF vs. 3.69 for improved viewing experience
• Blackout-free EVF vs. no (tracking a moving subject while continuously shooting is considerably easier)
• 14-bit with electronic shutter vs. 12
• Adjustable frame rates (30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7.5, 5, 3, 2, and 1 fps)
• 2.1 million dot LCD vs. 1.62 million
• In-body image stabilizer provides up to 8.5 stops of shake correction vs 8 (while 8.5 is better than 8, the difference seems modest)
• Up to 8k DCI 60p RAW, 4k DCI 60p SRAW, 4k DCI 120p MP4, 2k DCI 240p vs. 6K 60fps, 4K UHD 60 fps, FHD 180 fps
• Full-size HDMI Type-A port vs. micro type D
• Tally lamp vs. no (informs subject that movie is being recorded)
• 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E and 6 (6, 5, and 2.4 GHz) vs. 2.4 GHz
• CFexpress Type B plus SD vs. dual SD (CFexpress Type B is considerably faster but larger and more expensive)
• Neural Network upscaling (2x larger in both dimensions to 179 megapixels) and noise reduction processing in camera
• Includes a top LCD panel
• Speedlite shooting with electronic shutter supported
• Slightly raised Magnify, Info, and Q buttons
• New LP-E6P battery pack

That is a solid list.

Here are the R6 II's advantages:

• Up to ISO 102400 and 204800 vs. 51200 and 102400 (at the same ISO settings, the R6 II will have less noise when viewed at the pixel level. However, the R5 II image properly downsampled to 24 MP should appear similarly clean. The highest ISO settings are unusable)
• 40 fps vs. 30 (having faster continuous shooting available is an advantage, but 30 fps is really fast)
• 6K 60p ProRes RAW available (external recording only, with in-camera FHD proxy, 10-bit)
• Lower price

While few would choose the R6 II over the R5 II for features and capabilities, that last bullet, the lower price, makes this camera a great value and a top seller.

If you have not already done so, order the R5 II immediately if you have even a remote interest in it.

More Information

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II