Canon and Sony News for Aug 2021 (Page 2)
Ironically, the day after sharing the first Canon vs. Sony IBIS Comparison Test, Sony released Alpha 1 firmware update version 1.10. While IBIS was not called out in the list of updated features, discussions hinted that an IBIS performance update was possibly included in the "Other improvements in operational stability" line item. Sony would not divulge the answer to that question. That possibility left a little doubt in my mind, and ... I don't like doubt more than I don't like testing image stabilization.
Round 2. The procedures for the second comparison test were the same as for the first, and the text for this test will remain mostly identical to that of the initial test.
When shooting handheld, image stabilization performance can be a significant image quality factor. Sony has incorporated In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) in their cameras for many years — the a7 II and a7R II had this feature. Canon's first IBIS implementations arrived last summer in the Canon EOS R5 and EOS R6.
Especially given Sony's long head start with this technology, I wanted to know: Is Sony's IBIS better than Canon's? Or is Canon's IBIS better? It was also possible that the two systems would perform equally, and that piece of information would also be helpful to know. It was time to create a comparison featuring the latest high-end models from each company, the Canon EOS R5 vs. Sony Alpha 1.
CIPA's image stabilization ratings attempt to provide an objective measure of a camera's stabilization assistance capabilities. However, CIPA is considerably steadier than I am. There are no objective image stabilization tests that measure a camera's stabilization assistance specifically for me — or for you, and it is only a camera's stabilization assistance performance for the person holding the camera that matters. Even our personal stabilization needs are situational, with wind, physical exertion, footing stability, and other factors influencing our ability to hold a camera steady.
While I had opinions on the overall image stabilization performance of various Canon and Sony camera and lens combinations, explicitly testing the difference between the Canon and Sony camera IBIS had been interesting me. With identical Canon and Sony non-stabilized lenses in the lab at the same time, this comparison hit the top of my to-do list, becoming the priority.
While completely objective testing was not possible, it seemed that subjective testing could be dialed in to have meaning.
This IBIS testing was performed in the studio, with ideal handheld testing conditions, including solid (concrete) footing and no wind. During testing, elbows were not resting on the body, and the viewfinder was in use (vs. the rear LCD).
The Canon EOS R5 with an RF 50mm F1.2 L USM Lens was tested against a Sony Alpha 1 with an FE 50mm f/1.2 GM Lens. The cameras were set to single-shot mode, with the electronic first curtain shutter selected in Tv mode. A detailed test target (exceeding camera resolution) was positioned at eye level about 10' (3.3m) away, with the distance marked for consistency.
Starting at 1/25 second exposures (roughly 2 stops of stabilization assistance expected for me), 10 images were captured with each camera. The shutter duration on both cameras was then increased by 1/3 stop, and the testing was repeated, alternating cameras until 1-second exposures were on the cards. That procedure amounted to 150 pictures taken with each camera (10 shots x 15 shutter speeds), 300 pictures total.
The measure of sharpness is not boolean, true or false, meaning an arbitrary determination of pass or fail was required, and adding an intermediary grade seemed a good idea. In addition, everyone loves a score, a firm number that can quickly be compared and quoted.
If the image was unsalvageable, it went into the "Delete" category. If an image is blurry, it was a waste of time to capture, load, and process. Worse is that I may have counted on the image being sharp, meaning that the desired image was lost. The blurry image also consumed space on the memory card and later on the computer's SSD. Thus, in the "Score" column, five points are deducted for each image falling in this category.
If the image was salvageable via increasing the sharpness or down-sizing the image, it went into the "Useable" category. No points were given for these images. While they will often get the job done, these results were mediocre.
Crisply sharp images are what we want. Test images making the "Sharp" grade were awarded 5 points.
Most images were not hard to place in one of these three categories. The "benefit of the doubt" rule was implemented for those hard to grade, and the higher grade was given.
Here is the resulting Canon vs. Sony IBIS comparison table:
| Canon | Sony | Diff (Canon - Sony) | Score | |||||||||
| Exposure | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Canon | Sony | Diff |
| 1/25 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 50 | 45 | 5 |
| 1/20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| 1/15 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 50 | 45 | 5 |
| 1/13 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | -1 | -1 | 2 | 50 | 35 | 15 |
| 1/10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -1 | -1 | 2 | 35 | 20 | 15 |
| 1/8 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -2 | 0 | 2 | 45 | 25 | 20 |
| 1/6 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -2 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 10 |
| 1/5 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 25 | 25 | 0 |
| 1/4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 2 | -4 | -1 | 5 | 20 | -25 | 45 |
| 1/3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | -4 | 2 | 2 | 15 | -15 | 30 |
| 0.4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 5 | -5 |
| 0.5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | -4 | 1 | 3 | -10 | -45 | 35 |
| 0.6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 0 | -40 | -50 | 10 |
| 0.8 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | -45 | -35 | -10 |
| 1 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | -40 | -45 | 5 |
| Total | 41 | 21 | 88 | 61 | 17 | 72 | -20 | 4 | 16 | 235 | 55 | 180 |
The testing was so much fun that I decided to do it again. OK, the fun part was missing, but meaningful test results should be repeatable, right? While I made a significant effort to capture every test shot to the best of my current abilities, I had enough doubt in my mind to leave me unsatisfied. Testing for consistency seemed necessary.
Thus, after thoroughly evaluating the first set of results, the same test was repeated — another 300 images were captured. The results are as follows:
| Canon | Sony | Diff (Canon - Sony) | Score | |||||||||
| Exposure | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Canon | Sony | Diff |
| 1/25 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | -3 | 3 | 50 | 35 | 15 |
| 1/20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| 1/15 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | -1 | -2 | 3 | 50 | 30 | 20 |
| 1/13 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 0 |
| 1/10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | -1 | 4 | 45 | 10 | 35 |
| 1/8 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -3 | 2 | 1 | 35 | 15 | 20 |
| 1/6 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -2 | 1 | 1 | 35 | 20 | 15 |
| 1/5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | -2 | 3 | 25 | 5 | 20 |
| 1/4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 | -6 | 2 | 4 | 35 | -15 | 50 |
| 1/3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | -4 | 3 | 1 | 20 | -5 | 25 |
| 0.4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -7 | 2 | 5 | 10 | -50 | 60 |
| 0.5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -5 | 3 | 2 | -15 | -50 | 35 |
| 0.6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 1 | 1 | -35 | -50 | 15 |
| 0.8 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | -45 | -50 | 5 |
| 1 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | -40 | -50 | 10 |
| Total | 38 | 21 | 91 | 74 | 17 | 59 | -36 | 4 | 32 | 265 | -75 | 340 |
While these numbers are as meaningful as the first table, it was the consistency with the first test results that most interested me. The following table shows the deviation between the two tests. The second result was subtracted from the first result, with 0 or close to 0 indicating similar performance.
| Canon | Sony | |||||
| Exposure | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp |
| 1/25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 |
| 1/20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1/15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 2 |
| 1/13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 |
| 1/10 | 0 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1/8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1/6 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1/5 | -1 | 2 | -1 | -1 | -2 | 3 |
| 1/4 | 3 | -3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
| 1/3 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 |
| 0.4 | 1 | 0 | -1 | -6 | 1 | 5 |
| 0.5 | 0 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
| 0.6 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 3 | 0 |
| 1 | -1 | 2 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 0 | -3 | -13 | 0 | 13 |
To account for any testing anomalies, after compiling the second test results, the four exposure durations with the most deviation (none were significantly differing) for each camera were tested a third time (80 additional test shots). The worst of the three results for each camera was thrown out, leaving the results shown in the above tables.
I am very impressed at how consistent the results for the two tests are. The similarity adds credence to the test results.
Here is a summary table showing the combined first and second test results, along with the final scoring.
| Canon | Sony | Diff (Canon - Sony) | Score | |||||||||
| Exposure | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Delete | Useable | Sharp | Canon | Sony | Diff |
| 1/25 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 0 | -4 | 4 | 100 | 80 | 20 |
| 1/20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| 1/15 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 16 | -1 | -3 | 4 | 100 | 75 | 25 |
| 1/13 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 15 | -1 | -1 | 2 | 80 | 65 | 15 |
| 1/10 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 11 | -4 | -2 | 6 | 80 | 30 | 50 |
| 1/8 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 13 | -5 | 2 | 3 | 80 | 40 | 40 |
| 1/6 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -4 | 3 | 1 | 65 | 40 | 25 |
| 1/5 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 11 | -2 | 0 | 2 | 50 | 30 | 20 |
| 1/4 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 5 | -10 | 1 | 9 | 55 | -40 | 95 |
| 1/3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 7 | -8 | 5 | 3 | 35 | -20 | 55 |
| 0.4 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 5 | -7 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -45 | 55 |
| 0.5 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 1 | 0 | -9 | 4 | 5 | -25 | -95 | 70 |
| 0.6 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 3 | 1 | -75 | -100 | 25 |
| 0.8 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | -90 | -85 | -5 |
| 1 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 0 | -2 | 1 | 1 | -80 | -95 | 15 |
| Total | 79 | 42 | 179 | 135 | 34 | 131 | -56 | 8 | 48 | 500 | -20 | 520 |
So, we just got highly analytical with 680 subjective test results. Still, there seems to be some meaning here.
The sharp column from this table is illustrated in the graph included at the top of this post. From these results, it is arguable that the IBIS technology in the Canon EOS R5 is superior to that in the Sony Alpha 1 (for me, on this day, in this location, with the referenced lenses mounted). For example, follow the "10" line in the chart to see the shutter speed I required for a 50% sharp image rate.
Mostly, I experience a 1/3 - 2/3 stop advantage with the Canon camera. That difference is not dramatic, and the bottom line is that IBIS is valuable in both camera brands. This feature adds substantially to the versatility of non-stabilized lenses, such as the 50mm f/1.2 models tested here. IBIS is one more reason to love the latest mirrorless camera models.
From Canon U.S.A.:
Canon U.S.A., Inc. Focuses on Consumer Safety with an Anti-Counterfeit Consumer Education Microsite Update
MELVILLE, NY, August 9, 2021 – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging solutions, is taking the opportunity to spotlight its commitment to anti-counterfeit consumer education and safety awareness. Canon has a longstanding commitment to fight against the proliferation of counterfeit Canon products by helping to protect customers from receiving non-Canon products that are hazardous and can cause damage to their equipment. As part of this effort, Canon has updated its anti-counterfeit consumer education microsite, providing expanded information about commonly counterfeited Canon products, as well as informing consumers about the battery recognition technology that is built into certain Canon cameras and camcorders. The website can be found at usa.canon.com/aboutcounterfeits.
With the surge of online shopping, the availability of counterfeits for many brands has persisted and grown, leaving consumers unaware about counterfeits and unable to make informed purchasing decisions. The Canon anti-counterfeit consumer education microsite includes updated tips on how to spot counterfeits that unlawfully bear the Canon logo as well as a discussion about the difference between gray market and counterfeit goods for consumers who may not know how to distinguish between them. The microsite also offers consumers handy links to anti-counterfeit product advisories and resources, as well as a link to some valuable information that Canon provides to its consumers concerning another form of fakery being offered to the public-- some service and support companies passing themselves off as authorized Canon repair facilities.
Canon promotes safety by partnering with its consumers and sharing technical expertise. On the microsite, U.S. consumers are encouraged to use Canon U.S.A’s most important safety education tool – its anti-counterfeit hotline at 1-855-46-CANON – that allows Canon consumers to report suspicious Canon goods so that they can be authenticated by Canon before use.
“At Canon, we have invested deeply to ensure our technical staff is thoroughly trained and well equipped with the knowledge and tools required to properly identify non-genuine merchandise. The specific combination of our formal processes, access to proprietary manufacturing attributes, training, and tools available exclusively to our Canon service staff, allows us to discern even the most intricate differences between genuine and non-genuine items,” says Jason Fligman, Senior Director & General Manager of Customer Support Operations for the Imaging Technologies and Communications Group at Canon U.S.A., Inc. “We are very aware of the quality and safety issues that are common amongst counterfeit Canon products, and committed to assisting our valued customers in ensuring the authenticity of Canon-branded items.”
Canon encourages consumers who seek to buy genuine Canon products to purchase them through authorized dealers by using a dealer locator link on Canon’s website or through a brand-based online store, such as Canon Direct. Canon also pursues counterfeiters in the U.S. and around the world to protect its customers from potentially unsafe products that unlawfully use the Canon name, as well as to protect the value, trusted reputation and loyalty that the Canon brand has acquired over decades in producing high-quality, safe and reliable products.
Correction: I Just fixed a duplication mistake in the revised review (sorry about that). There are two new sets of 100% crop samples shared in the revised review, and now they are different. The missing second set was relevant to the "Will I notice?" discussion.
Original post: I couldn't let the uncertainty of the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens focus shift issue rest and have just tested a second copy of the lens.
The Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens Review has been updated. Search the review page (CTRL-F / CMD-F) for "bad copy" (sorry, the bookmark link is not working) to jump to the update.
Order the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens from B&H | Adorama | Canon USA | Amazon USA | WEX
Rent the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens from Lensrentals.
Please share!
I couldn't let the uncertainty of the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens focus shift issue rest and have just tested a second copy of the lens.
The Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens Review has been updated. Search the review page (CTRL-F / CMD-F) for "bad copy" (sorry, the bookmark link is not working) to jump to the update.
Order the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens from B&H | Adorama | Canon USA | Amazon USA | WEX
Rent the Canon RF 100mm F2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens from Lensrentals.
Please share!
Image quality test results have been added to the Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens page.
Note that Canon mandates distortion correction for this lens in-camera (in the viewfinder) and in Canon Digital Photo Professional (DPP).
Here are some comparisons to get started:
Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens compared to Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens
Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens compared to Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
The Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens is available for order at B&H | Adorama | Canon USA | Amazon USA | WEX
Rent the Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens from Lensrentals.
Please share!
From Tamron:
TAMRON Announces the Development of the World's[1] First Mirrorless Zoom Lens with a Maximum Wide-open Aperture of F2
A fast-aperture “travel zoom” with seamless zoom action from wide-angle through telephoto range
35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Model A058)
August 4, 2021, Commack, NY - Tamron announces the development of a fast-aperture telephoto zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras, the 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Model A058). The lens is expected to launch in 2021.
[1] Among the zoom lenses for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras (As of July 2021: TAMRON)
Overview of the 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Model A058) features
The 35-150mm F2-2.8 is a zoom lens that covers the range from wide-angle (35mm) through telephoto (150mm) and is ideal for travel photography. It is the first zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras to have a maximum wide-open aperture of F2. With this focal range, you can enjoy shooting magnificent views and large buildings at 35mm and dynamic close-up shots at 150mm. Travel photographers can easily take beautiful sunrise and sunset shots, shoot distinctive exterior buildings and interiors like restaurants, and take twilight and nightscape photos. With high-level performance under a wide variety of shooting conditions, this new fast lens is ideal for travel aimed at creating superb photographic works. By incorporating the VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) linear motor focus mechanism, the lens features a very high-speed and high-precision autofocus for a fast-aperture lens. It also incorporates a new design in the pursuit of enhanced operability and ergonomic texture.
The new lens supports the full array of frequently used angles-of-view including wide-angle, standard, medium telephoto and telephoto, making it easy to compose the perfect shot without changing lenses or your position from the subject.
Originally developed software ‘TAMRON Lens Utility’ for lens function customization
This lens is compatible with the new ‘TAMRON Lens Utility’ software originally and uniquely developed by TAMRON. TAMRON Lens Utility can be operated via your computer by connecting the lens from its Connector Port via the optional TAMRON Connection Cable[2]. Users can customize the functions and update the firmware through the lens rather than through the camera. The personal customization gives flexible shooting options to match the shooting situation such as still photography or videography.
[2] TAMRON Connection Cable (USB Type-A to Type-C) sold separately.
(Functions of TAMRON Lens Utility)
Focus Set Button settings
- A-B Focus: Set 2 focus positions (A and B) and make the focus automatically shift between A and B
- Focus Preset: Set your desired focus position and move the focus to the recorded point by a click
- Switch Focus Ring Function (Focus/Aperture): Switch Focus Ring Function from focus adjustment to aperture adjustment
- Assign function from the camera: Assign custom functions from the camera body to the Focus Set Button
*The function of Focus Set Button can be cleared
Focus Ring settings
- MF Ring Rotation: Change the rotation direction of the focus ring
- MF Method: Choose the method of focus operation when using the focus ring
Firmware update
Orders
When orders are accepted, get the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Lens from B&H.
Another highly attractive lens from Tamron:
TAMRON Announces Development of Second-Generation Fast-Aperture Standard Zoom Lens for Sony Full-Frame Mirrorless Cameras
New 28-75mm F2.8 G2 offers significantly improved optical and autofocus performance and new function customization
28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 (Model A063)
August 4, 2021, Commack, NY - Tamron announces the development of a second generation fast-aperture standard zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras: 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 (Model A063). The lens is expected to launch in 2021.
Overview of the 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 (Model A063) features
The 28-75mm F2.8 G2 is the successor of the 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD (Model A036), a popular zoom lens that has earned high evaluation worldwide. It reflects the fruits of continuous evolution and customer-focused refinement. Retaining the well-received compact size of its predecessor, the new 28-75mm F2.8 G2 incorporates a new optical construction based on a design that has been revamped to enhance imaging performance and its features are compatible with the latest model digital cameras that offer increased resolution. The AF drive, TAMRON’s VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive) linear motor focus mechanism, is adopted to deliver higher autofocus speed with greater precision. With the MOD (Minimum Object Distance) of 7.1” at the wide end and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7, the lens boasts advanced close-up shooting performance. Additionally, it features a new design in the pursuit of enhanced operability and ergonomic texture. TAMRON pioneered the category of compact fast-aperture standard zoom lenses for mirrorless cameras and the new 28-75mm F2.8 G2 truly is a next-generation lens for everyday use.
Originally developed software ‘TAMRON Lens Utility’ for lens function customization
This lens is compatible with the new ‘TAMRON Lens Utility’ software originally and uniquely developed by TAMRON. TAMRON Lens Utility can be operated via your computer by connecting the lens from its Connector Port via the optional TAMRON Connection Cable[1]. Users can customize the functions and update the firmware through the lens rather than through the camera. The personal customization gives flexible shooting options to match the shooting situation such as still photography or videography.
[1] TAMRON Connection Cable (USB Type-A to Type-C) sold separately.
(Functions of TAMRON Lens Utility)
Focus Set Button settings
- A-B Focus: Set 2 focus positions (A and B) and make the focus automatically shift between A and B
- Focus Preset: Set your desired focus position and move the focus to the recorded point by a click
- Switch Focus Ring Function (Focus/Aperture): Switch Focus Ring Function from focus adjustment to aperture adjustment
- Assign function from the camera: Assign custom functions from the camera body to the Focus Set Button
*The function of Focus Set Button can be cleared
Focus Ring settings
- MF Ring Rotation: Change the rotation direction of the focus ring
- MF Method: Choose the method of focus operation when using the focus ring
Firmware update
Main features
- Best image quality in standard zoom lens class
- Fast, quiet VXD linear motor for high-speed and high-precision autofocus
- MOD (Minimum Object Distance) of 7.1” at wide end and maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7 for creative close-ups
- New design provides enhanced texture and greater user-friendliness
- Lightweight, compact design with emphasis on ease of use, plus 67mm filter size
* Specifications, appearance, functionality, etc., are subject to change without prior notice.
Orders
When orders are accepted, get the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Lens from B&H.
The Sigma 150-600mm DG lenses have been extremely popular, and the DN lens is even better, including considerably smaller size and lighter weight than the Sports version.
Order the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports Lens at B&H and Adorama.
From Sigma:
SIGMA Corporation is pleased to announce the SIGMA 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports.
Capture the magic through your finder.
Introducing the SIGMA 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports, a powerful ultra-telephoto zoom and the first ever Sports line lens for mirrorless systems. This portable and practical optic revolutionizes the way mirrorless users capture wildlife, motorsport and other fast-action subjects.
The 150–600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports is SIGMA Sports line’s first ultra-telephoto zoom lens, designed from the ground up specifically for full-frame mirrorless cameras. It offers outstanding levels of performance, functionality, and build quality required for ultra-telephoto shooting in the most demanding situations.
Image quality is exceptional, with ultra-high-performance glass capable of delivering ultra-sharp results even on the highest resolution cameras. The lens displays beautiful bokeh throughout its zoom range, and optical aberrations are kept well under control. It can be used with SIGMA’s 1.4× and 2x L-Mount teleconverters, with AF effective up to 1200mm.
Fast and accurate autofocus owing to an AF unit equipped with a high-precision magnetic sensor, combined with an OS (Optical Stabilizer) function effective to approximately 4 stops* of image stabilization makes this a highly responsive lens that can handle even the most challenging subjects. It has a Dual Action Zoom system that includes straight and ring zoom, a dust and splash resistant structure, and customizable switches helping photographers and filmmakers adapt quickly and easily to virtually any shooting environment.
Capture the long-reach images you have always wanted with an ultra-telephoto lens—that’s the visual experience you will enjoy with the 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS | Sports, the first ultra-telephoto lens for mirrorless systems from SIGMA Sports line.
* Based on CIPA guidelines (measured in 600mm with a 35mm full-size image sensor)
Supplied accessories: Case, Cover Hood (LH1034-01), Front Cap (LCF-95?), Cover Lens Cap (LC-747E), Shoulder Strap, Tripod Socket (TS-121), Rear Cap (LCR?)
Available mount: L-Mount, Sony E-mount
* The appearance and specifications of the product are subject to change.
* L-Mount is a registered trademark of Leica Camera AG.
*This product is developed, manufactured and sold based on the specifications of E-mount which was disclosed by Sony Corporation under the license agreement with Sony Corporation.
#SIGMA #SIGMA150600mmSports #SIGMASports #SIGMADGDN
Watch the interesting, detailed product announcement video below. Skip to 8:00 to begin the content portion:
Order the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports Lens at B&H and Adorama.
Image quality test results have been added to the Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens Review.
Like its RF 600mm counterpart and as expected, this lens turns in outstanding results.
Despite the Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens and Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens being nearly identical, including a shared optical design, one opportunity for the RF 400 to differentiate itself was optical performance with extenders. More specifically, RF extenders vs. EF extenders.
There is some improvement with the RF extenders in place, and the 1.4x comparison at f/4.5 shows slightly more improvement.
Can the RF 400mm F2.8 lens and 1.4x extender substitute for an RF 600mm F4? Perhaps. Keeping in mind that 560mm is not 600mm, check out the Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens vs. Canon RF 600mm F4 L IS USM Lens comparison. Then remember that the 600mm lens does not have f/2.8 available.
Additional comparisons:
Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens compared to Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens. Don't miss the with extenders comparison.
Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens compared to Sony FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS Lens
The Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens is available for order at B&H | Adorama | Canon USA | Amazon USA | WEX
Rent the Canon RF 400mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens from Lensrentals.
Please share!
Just posted: Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VXD Lens Review.
This lens is worth adding to the kit.
The Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VXD Lens is available for order at B&H (expected in stock Aug 04)| Adorama | Amazon USA | WEX
Rent the Tamron 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VXD Lens from Lensrentals.
Please share!
Canon has released new versions of Digital Photo Professional and EOS Utility.
Changes for Digital Photo Professional 4.15.0 and EOS Utility 3.13.30:
- Supports Firmware Version 1.5.0 or later for the EOS-1D X Mark III.
- Supports Firmware Version 1.4.0 or later for the EOS R5.
- Supports Firmware Version 1.4.0 or later for the EOS R6.
Download: DPP 4.15.0, EOS Utility 3.13.30, and Picture Style Editor 1.26.0
Note that, for some reason, the release date for this software is "8/19/21", a future date. Also, firmware update 1.4.0 is not yet available for the R5.
 "Share on Pinterest!"){kind=small}
 |
|